![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
November 27, 2003
The Stumbling Block
Putting aside for a moment all this pie-in-the-sky, we-are-the-world stuff, let's switch to more immediate concerns. We were warned by our keynote at the conference against overhyping our efforts, and he's right. The more we reflect and rhapsodize about our vision, the more we'll tune out the press, and thereby the decision makers. Better to sneak up on them ... we should underpromise and overdeliver. But there's a bigger reason to shut up about it: I think in the short run the Semantic Web is more likely to fail than succeed. I went down to Sanibel to see if "it's soup yet", to see if the technology is mature enough to build real products with. My tentative answer is "yes", but with an asterisk. Hell, it's not just an asterisk, it's a huge gaping chasm of doubt. No, not "do we need it." We need it. No, not "will it work." It will work. Here's the real stumbling block: getting people to annotate their data. The biggest questions in a product pitch should be, "Will they do it?" and "Why?" A few presenters did talk about this. One suggested the "Two G Scale": one side Gurus, the other, Grannies. He talked about closing the "the semantic gap." The next presenter talked about motivating end-users to annotate by providing instant gratification. The efforts they mention are certainly steps in the right direction. The fact they're even working on the problem is encouraging. And I do agree that "a little semantics goes a long way." But here's the thing: most people (and I do mean most) keep all their email in their inbox. Before the Semantic Web can come close to delivering on its promise, we need to find ways to convince non-technical types into wanting to think abstractly. Academics, developers, and businessfolk are unusually organized compared to "the rest of us," which is why this may be hard to see at first. Hell, forget annotation. We've got to find compelling and obvious reasons for them to want to use metadata. My focus is squarely on the Granny side, and it's not just cause I like Grannies. It's because software that Grannies can use is software that all of us can use. The clarity of an obvious interface is a real competitive advantage. Not convinced? Compare Yahoo to Google.
Semantic Web Extreme Goodness I had to add a whole new category just to reference these two resources. First, an excellent summary of the recent semantic web discussions, annotated even, can be found at Themes and Metaphors in the Semantic Web. Thanks to Chris... from Semantic Web for Poets at December 3, 2003 10:42 PM Comments |
About Me Contact Me being real blogosphere events interconnectedness isabel making money musings olpc photo stories saving the world semantic web squeak etoys tidepool and storymill usability waveplace computer literacy new videos from st john pilot back from st john immuexa turns ten XO donor comments photos from haiti and st john pilots haitian pilot starts give two, keep none story: fall 2007 good press RDF Intro Angela Talk: a semweb introduction W3C Semantic Web Original Road Map SciAm Article SemanticWeb.org RDF Resource Guide SchemaWeb SUMO Full Article Index April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 December 2006 September 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 link to this site
![]()
|
||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
"Big Fractal Tangle" is a phrase used by Tim Berners-Lee at ISWC 2003
to describe his vision of the Semantic Web (used with permission) "Tidepool" and "Storymill" are trademarks of Immuexa Corporation. Website design copyright © 2003-2004 by Immuexa. |
|||||||||