![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
November 28, 2003
The Semantic Gap
Years ago, at my father's old ad agency, I took over in the accounting department after they'd let a woman go who'd been doing the books. For a month I struggled with her filing system, rummaging in the cabinets for ten minutes each time I wanted something. Bills from the same health insurance company would sometimes appear in "Insurance", and sometimes under the company's name, and sometimes under "Benefits." I finally gave up and took a week to completely reorganize everything. The ability to organize is a teachable skill, though it's often seen as a personality trait we've either got or we don't. We say things like, "she's organized", but rarely "she should practice organizing." And how do we practice organizing? Where do we learn to make the subtle semantic distinctions necessary to create useful hierarchies? How do we acquire the discipline to maintain and adhere to a system's structure over time? The truth is that we're never explicitly taught to organize. It's something we pick up over time, working with other people's systems, hearing "put this here" repeatedly until we get a sense for it. We then make our own folder hierarchies, we organize our books and CDs, then evolve these structures to fit our changing needs. We learn what works on our own. But some aren't shown how, and so live with the clutter. They become semantic "have nots" and grow used to sifting through piles. If they're lucky, they'll pair up with an organizer, so instead they can ask, "Hey honey, where's the battery charger?" They resign themselves to being "disorganized" and adapt themselves accordingly. Until they use a computer, that is. Computers need a name for everything. When the pesky thing asks, "Do you want to save your document" and requires a name, the semantic have-nots simply type what comes to mind: "memo-sat.doc", "joey.doc", "tripStuff.doc". Good luck finding something a year later. Oftentimes, they'll have to open ten files to find what they're looking for, which is why eventually they'll simply stop searching. Because it's so hard to find things, they'll be less likely to look, which means in the end there's no payoff in naming things well. To my mind it's crucial we ask a few questions as we build our new tools. Why are people disorganized? Have they learned to stop looking? How can we bring them back? What can we do to close the semantic gap? |
About Me Contact Me being real cognitive agents education family making money musings photo stories publicity saving the world semantic web software pointy bot the deep future washington week what we love internal tenants the clear unknown warm chill terse parent exclusive language rosie RDF Intro Angela Talk: a semweb introduction W3C Semantic Web Original Road Map SciAm Article SemanticWeb.org RDF Resource Guide SchemaWeb SUMO Full Article Index March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 August 2008 June 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 December 2006 September 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 link to this site
![]()
|
||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
"Big Fractal Tangle" is a phrase used by Tim Berners-Lee at ISWC 2003
to describe his vision of the Semantic Web (used with permission) "Tidepool" and "Storymill" are trademarks of Immuexa Corporation. Website design copyright © 2003-2004 by Immuexa. |
|||||||