![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
December 15, 2003
task list limbo
Today I tried to do something I've been meaning to do for a long time: get my websites to validate as strict XHTML. Till today, I haven't rated it enough of a priority to take the time. Giving myself thirty minutes for the first site, I made it most of the way, but bailed because I couldn't get the layout to work easily in all browsers. Now don't get me wrong. I'm a standards conscious guy, and I believe strongly in refactoring. I'm always taking that extra five minutes (or thirty) to make things more readable, more flexible, and more maintainable. So why is it I've avoided this task all these years, in spite of seeing XHTML checkmark logos everywhere? Why, with all the hours I've wasted with browser idiosyncracies, hoping and praying for standards adherence, have I let my sites languish when standards compliance is finally becoming practical and prevalent? Because I didn't need to. That's why. The only reason I dipped my foot into the pool today is that I've got a fair number of "validators" reading this site, so felt obliged to at least make the effort. W3C folk do a lot of work on our behalf. The least I can do is change a few <br>s to <br />s. This kind of task list limbo is typical. A few years ago, the wireless phone line extender we use for our ReplayTV stopped working, so as a "temporary" measure, I ran a phone cord across the middle of our living room. It's still there. Why? Because I haven't needed to take care of it, so instead we occassionally trip on the wire and feel marginally embarrassed when people visit. There's so many other things higher on the list. Being passionate about our projects, it's easy to forget that most others consider our "new better way" as another goddamn thing they gotta struggle with. Achieving industry buy-in is a tough nut to crack, particularly for the already over-burdened. Why should I spend an hour learning your technology? I've got a stack of ten books on my desk. What can your widget do for me now. Nothing yet? Then why are we talking? Again: we need better 'right-now' answers to motivate the masses into wanting the Semantic Web. More than this, we need to convince them it'll solve a painful problem of theirs, otherwise they won't even take the time.
Comments |
About Me Contact Me being real blogosphere events interconnectedness isabel making money musings olpc photo stories saving the world semantic web squeak etoys tidepool and storymill usability waveplace computer literacy new videos from st john pilot back from st john immuexa turns ten XO donor comments photos from haiti and st john pilots haitian pilot starts give two, keep none story: fall 2007 good press RDF Intro Angela Talk: a semweb introduction W3C Semantic Web Original Road Map SciAm Article SemanticWeb.org RDF Resource Guide SchemaWeb SUMO Full Article Index April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 December 2006 September 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 link to this site
![]()
|
||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
"Big Fractal Tangle" is a phrase used by Tim Berners-Lee at ISWC 2003
to describe his vision of the Semantic Web (used with permission) "Tidepool" and "Storymill" are trademarks of Immuexa Corporation. Website design copyright © 2003-2004 by Immuexa. |
|||||||||