![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
January 07, 2004
foaf runs amok
To prep for my upcoming talk with Dan Brickley, father of FOAF, I figured I'd indulge myself in some wild and irreverant conjecture before hunkering down to a more concise and clear FOAF Tangle Yarn. Imagine someone casts a spell, and we all woke up tomorrow without fear of universal IDs. Let's say Dan bought the domain "humanity.org" and established a worldwide FOAF repository. To make this really wacky, let's say someone invented a cheap way to determine a unique hash ID from our personal genetic code. I can see it now: I walk into my local pharmacy, drop a few quarters into the DNA reader, spit on a slip of paper and slip it in the machine, then out pops a printout of my unique dnaChecksum. I run right home with it and create an account at "humanity.org", where I answer a few questions and it creates and registers my FOAF resource, complete with a brand new dnaChecksum-related PGP key (we'll assume this is an SSL connection). So now that I'm "somebody", I start browsing humanity.org. "Hey, this is just like Buddy Lists," I think as I find friends and link them to my new record. Over time, others link to my record, adding properties of their own to my FOAF representation, such as "I really trust this guy" and "don't ever date this loser." My dnaChecksum becomes very handy. I sign my email with it (the new vcard). I create accounts with it. It's all very safe because of my PGP password, which I change every three hours just to be sure. Over time, Dan's website becomes the kinder, gentler, Passport system, free of Microsoft tyranny and IRS ickyness. Of course the load would become too great, so humanity.org would branch out, much like name registrars. There'd always be the central site, which would simply redirect your dnaChecksum request to the appropriate FOAF server. People would extend FOAF willy-nilly, creating all sorts of Match.com ontologies, all rooted in the universal dnaChecksum. People would find themselves sneaking a stray hair of an intended into their purse, then bringing it to the pharmacy to determine if their blind date was really who he said he was. Nevermind the Gattaca implications. Our DNA readers would just give out the checksum. After a while of course, the government would get into the act. Our dnaChecksum would reference our tax records, our driving records, our credit histories, our birth certificates. Eventually, this number would be used for everything: driver's license, phone number, email, auto keyless entry, home alarm system, ATM/credit card. Nobody would be able to do naughty things though, because we'd protect ourselves with that ever-changing PGP password. And in the end, after our funeral, the undertaker would submit our PGP revokation certificate to the humanity.org website. Our FOAF record would gain yet another property, perhaps its last: <foaf:lifeStatus>deceased</foaf:lifeStatus> Hey, you never know. All this could happen, right?
Comments |
About Me Contact Me being real blogosphere events interconnectedness isabel making money musings olpc photo stories saving the world semantic web squeak etoys tidepool and storymill usability waveplace computer literacy new videos from st john pilot back from st john immuexa turns ten XO donor comments photos from haiti and st john pilots haitian pilot starts give two, keep none story: fall 2007 good press RDF Intro Angela Talk: a semweb introduction W3C Semantic Web Original Road Map SciAm Article SemanticWeb.org RDF Resource Guide SchemaWeb SUMO Full Article Index April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 December 2006 September 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 link to this site
![]()
|
||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
"Big Fractal Tangle" is a phrase used by Tim Berners-Lee at ISWC 2003
to describe his vision of the Semantic Web (used with permission) "Tidepool" and "Storymill" are trademarks of Immuexa Corporation. Website design copyright © 2003-2004 by Immuexa. |
|||||||||