![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
February 09, 2004
the web is flat
One thing's clear to me about the Semantic Web: our current user interface metaphors aren't gonna cut it. Lists and trees have served us well, but in the massively interconnected world to come, they'll fall flat on their faces. But wait, don't we already have the World Wide Web? Isn't that the point of hyperlinks? Aren't we already massively interconnected? Well no, not really, at least not to most people. Yeah, we can do it, but most websites use hyperlinks as a kind of menu item, not an indication of inter-related resources. The "hyper" in hyperlink has become of secondary importance these days, taking a back seat to presentation and site navigation. Truth is, the Web's a lot flatter than any of us imagined it'd be ten years ago. Most people go to Google, type in a few words, and presto, they're where they want to be. The Web's become a kind of massive library, with Google as its card catalog. Yeah, the books are interconnected if you bother to read the bibliographies, but who does that? The Web's become this massive hub (Google) with a zillion spokes, all leading to separate sites that rarely link to each other. And why should they? As a web designer, it's often a dumb move to link to other sites. Hyperlinks draw traffic away, when the goal is usually to keep it there. Yeah, certain sites position themselves as portal or resource sites, but the vast majority are better off not diluting their message with tangential offsite links. Yes, there are exceptions, particularly the blogging world, which has benefited greatly from the kind of cross-pollination that hyperlinks can bring. But blogs are relatively new. For every blog, there are likely hundreds of "castaway" sites, cut off from everyone but Google and maybe Yahoo. Why is the current web so flat? Two reasons come to mind. First, it's too hard for people to make links, so they don't. Second, and more importantly, people have a hard time visualizing interconnectedness, so they stick to what's familiar: lists and trees. Clearly for the Semantic Web to really take off, we need engaging ways for people to visualize interconnectedness. We need new UI metaphors.
Comments |
About Me Contact Me being real blogosphere events interconnectedness isabel making money musings olpc photo stories saving the world semantic web squeak etoys tidepool and storymill usability waveplace waveplace on NPR new courseware; new pilots immokalee pilot has started! computer literacy new videos from st john pilot back from st john immuexa turns ten XO donor comments photos from haiti and st john pilots haitian pilot starts RDF Intro Angela Talk: a semweb introduction W3C Semantic Web Original Road Map SciAm Article SemanticWeb.org RDF Resource Guide SchemaWeb SUMO Full Article Index June 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 December 2006 September 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 link to this site
![]()
|
||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
"Big Fractal Tangle" is a phrase used by Tim Berners-Lee at ISWC 2003
to describe his vision of the Semantic Web (used with permission) "Tidepool" and "Storymill" are trademarks of Immuexa Corporation. Website design copyright © 2003-2004 by Immuexa. |
|||||||||