timothy falconer's semantic weblog
Big Fractal Tangle


RDF
 



the new name

Today, after five weeks of obsessive product name uncertainty, our team finally agreed on a new name to replace Akimbo for our desktop application: Waveplace™. Along the way, we considered 137 names, of which eight were given serious consideration. In the end, we went back to a name we already had.

I thought of the name Waveplace in June of 1999 when I bought the domains for a "a web-based interactive story realm for children aged 5 through 10 that includes interactive plot lines, animations, games, and cognitive bot characters that learn about each child and make suggestions according to interest & ability." We launched the initial site a month later, which we built up over the next few years. Since our current project is a bigger priority, we decided to shelve the kid's website and take its name.

Here are some of the reasons for choosing the name "Waveplace":

  1. smooth sailing from a trademark standpoint (we have prior use)

  2. we already have the domains (com/net/org)

  3. it's easy to spell

  4. it's easy to pronounce

  5. it's a NAME .. not a play title

  6. wave as in "by the ocean"

  7. wave as in "hello, how are you!"

  8. wave as in "brain waves, on same wavelength"

  9. wave as in sound waves (hearing)

  10. wave as in light waves (seeing)

  11. we have a history with it ... we've been using it for family email aliases since 99... it's very easy to remember

  12. it has an association with my mom, which is how this program got started ... she was rosie@waveplace.com... she liked the name

  13. it has a container sense to it, so you can "put the photos in waveplace"

  14. it connects with the semantic browsing experience... brain waves sense... overlapping circles

  15. it'll jump out at you on a product shelf, with the right logo & packaging

  16. it'll be easy to spell, remember, and say in foreign languages

  17. WE'LL BE DONE WITH THIS NAME LIMBO

The part I like best is that my mom knew the name, and she liked it. It also helps that after a prolonged and contentious naming quandary, all but two on our team listed it as their #1. Consensus is a wonderful thing.




Trackbacks (use http://immuexa.com/cgi-bin/mtype/mt-tb.cgi/131)


Comments

You know Russell Beattie's [1] company just launched a bunch of products called Wave*, right? Having to do with location-based web services for mobile users.

[1] http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/

posted by Manuzhai at February 21, 2004 04:18 AM


Yeah, just finished an email to our IP lawyer about it when your comment arrived. I found their site a few hours ago, while trying to get my new Nokia 6600 to work with my PowerBook. Pretty strange they'd do their demo on the same day we decided to use the name Waveplace. Even stranger is that I was in the middle of brainstorming features to integrate our products with smart phones. Morphic resonance is a real kick.

posted by Timothy Falconer at February 21, 2004 04:39 AM


Looks like "wave" has become cliche in the cellphone space. We weren't looking here till a week ago.

Openwave
Intuwave
Wavemarket (with WaveIQ, WaveSpotter, WaveAlert, WaveBlog)


Seems like "wave" is the new "stream".

posted by Timothy Falconer at February 22, 2004 07:28 AM


Does this mean you're not going to go ahead with your product name, again?

posted by Manuzhai at February 22, 2004 02:48 PM


Just got off the phone with my trademark lawyer. He says that legally, there's not a conflict, which means we could use it if we wanted to.

Whether we want to is another question. Seems like "wave" has saturated the mobile phone market. Since there's a chance that we'll have a mobile phone version of our client, we're leaning against using Waveplace, though we haven't decided yet. (Even in small unconventional companies, such things take time.) We're open to suggestions though!

posted by Timothy Falconer at February 25, 2004 11:13 AM


FYI, yesterday we changed the name to Tidepool.

posted by Timothy Falconer at March 1, 2004 11:14 PM