![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
July 12, 2004
multi-stories
Tonight we watched Love Actually as inspiration for the sort of interconnected narrative I alluded to yesterday, as was mentioned on JOHO. David's right in saying there's an integrity of storyline that's needed, no matter how many expositional tricks we play, as with Memento. The difference, I think, will be in how we package and stitch together plot, and what we'll call "a work". Tonight's movie used interconnection quite effectively, where each separate plot harmonized with each other like themes building in a symphonic work, unlike some Robert Altman films that seem more like channel-surfing. The degenerate case would be something like "Love Boat", where separate plots simply share location and you could swap plots between episodes without affecting the whole. Compare this with the two storylines in Cold Mountain (hers and his), which could not exist without each other, as both build toward a very shared resolve. Intermixing's nothing new, but it currently unfolds in a controlled manner, chosen by the author or editor. Each time time I watch Blue, White, and Red, the stories proceed as always, though I may notice more crossover between them. Wouldn't it be interesting if I could easily alter the course a bit, perhaps dial down one side-plot or follow a minor character instead? An example is Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead, which follows two minor characters in Hamlet around instead. Imagine if you were tired of a scene and could choose to follow Guildenstern out the door. Creating such works would be tricky. You'd have to pay special attention to connecting points, making them useful and compelling in multiple contexts. It's hard to imagine this right now, but I'm nearly sure this will seem almost normal in the future. The trick is to preserve the integrity without degenerating into channel flipping. An easier thing to envision would be interconnected documentaries. You're watching Ken Burns do The Civil War, within which might be a reference to Elizabeth Cady Stanton & Susan B. Anthony. Rather than having to trudge your way through yet another battle scene, you could switch over to the other documentary, then switch back at a later point. It's not hard to see where the semweb could help here. Imagine every book, album, and movie were digitized, annotated, and available. What kind of wicked cool montages could we create? What semantic playlists might we publish? |
About Me Contact Me being real cognitive agents education family making money musings photo stories publicity saving the world semantic web software pointy bot the deep future washington week what we love internal tenants the clear unknown warm chill terse parent exclusive language rosie RDF Intro Angela Talk: a semweb introduction W3C Semantic Web Original Road Map SciAm Article SemanticWeb.org RDF Resource Guide SchemaWeb SUMO Full Article Index March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 August 2008 June 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 December 2006 September 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 link to this site
![]()
|
||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
"Big Fractal Tangle" is a phrase used by Tim Berners-Lee at ISWC 2003
to describe his vision of the Semantic Web (used with permission) "Tidepool" and "Storymill" are trademarks of Immuexa Corporation. Website design copyright © 2003-2004 by Immuexa. |
|||||||