![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
November 17, 2004
bill of goods
I haven't written since the American election. I've talked about it. I've read and watched a great deal of conjecture. As usual, everyone's exaggerating for dramatic effect, saying the Democrats were trounced, when in the end the difference was just 140,000 votes in Ohio, which is pretty small. If the 2000 election hadn't happened, they'd be calling this one the closest ever. What worries me is why the Republicans won. I'm not sure I buy the whole "moral values" hypothesis (ie, gay marriage drove red voters to the polls), but as a student of persuasion, I'm shell-shocked by the methods and language used in both campaigns. I'm not much bothered that the campaigns used these tactics. I'm mostly bothered that they worked. As I see it, someone sold us Americans a bill of goods, and though the receipt doesn't come close to adding up, we paid in full anyway. Given this, I need to know how they sold it to us, and why we bought it. So I'm reading Lakoff, first Metaphors We Live By, then Moral Politics : How Liberals and Conservatives Think. There's a metaphoric arsenal at work in our national dialog that's both obvious and insidious. It's also contrary to the very principles we hold dear, such as freedom, fairness, and collective consensus. Regardless of your political bent, you've got to give the Republicans credit for selling George Bush ... the Connecticut-born, Harvard & Yale educated, sports franchise and oil company owning, son of a former president ... as a rural-minded, folksy washington outsider ... as an aw-shucks real guy ... the friend of the common man. They did a great job of marketing, sincerely. My hats off to Rove and friends. As disappointing as all this feels, I'm still hopeful for our national discourse because of the work we're all doing with the Semantic Web. Throughout the election, I've fantasized about point & click accountability and easily accessed meta-layers of commentary on all that's said. It might just be the dreamer in me, but right now I'm thinking that the more meshed we get, the harder it'll be to sell us simpleton talking points, making things harder for the Roves of the world.
Comments |
About Me Contact Me being real blogosphere events interconnectedness isabel making money musings olpc photo stories saving the world semantic web squeak etoys tidepool and storymill usability waveplace computer literacy new videos from st john pilot back from st john immuexa turns ten XO donor comments photos from haiti and st john pilots haitian pilot starts give two, keep none story: fall 2007 good press RDF Intro Angela Talk: a semweb introduction W3C Semantic Web Original Road Map SciAm Article SemanticWeb.org RDF Resource Guide SchemaWeb SUMO Full Article Index April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 December 2006 September 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 link to this site
![]()
|
||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||
|
"Big Fractal Tangle" is a phrase used by Tim Berners-Lee at ISWC 2003
to describe his vision of the Semantic Web (used with permission) "Tidepool" and "Storymill" are trademarks of Immuexa Corporation. Website design copyright © 2003-2004 by Immuexa. |
|||||||||